The EnGenius ECW230S is presently among the 2 WiFi 6 gain access to points that use the WIPS and No DFS radios to significantly enhance the method the system admin can keep track of the network by getting a much better understanding of the channel usage, the live customers and some other network activities.
However another element of this revitalized variation is the AirGuard security tools that assist identify harmful attacks, rogue SSIDs, wicked twins and even RF jamming. So, while the EnGenius ECW230S does look similar to the ECW230 in regards to style, some modifications have actually been made at the hardware level to guarantee that a few of these function can work. However yes, in many part the ECW230 and the ECW230S do not actually vary that much.
You still get the 2.5 GbE Ethernet port that supports PoE, MU-MIMO 4 × 4 and the necessary OFDMA tech to assist with the denser networks. Moreover, there is assistance for the Cloud management platform which permits the simple tracking and management of big networks all over the world and there is likewise support for producing a mesh network together with other EnGenius cordless gain access to points.
However, as I asked myself when I evaluated the ECW220S, was the EnGenius ECW230S really required and exists a point updating from the ECW230 that quickly? Let’s put the EnGenius ECW230S to the test and learn.
Style and Construct Quality
If you put the EnGenius ECW230S and the ECW230 beside each other, you’re not going to be able toddler inform them apart right away. Both procedure 8.27 x 8.27 x 1.31 inches (20.5 x 20.5 x 3.3 cm) and both gadgets utilize a plastic top plus a metal bottom for the case. And it’s an actually well considered style, the case is slim, it looks excellent on the wall, so it’s much better than most likely 90% of other gain access to points on the marketplace.
Obviously, the plastic piece is covered by a white matte surface, so it will suit on the ceiling, even if there are some LEDs pointing down. You can turn them off if you desire, however they do serve the exact same function as on the ECW230. You get the Power LED (flashes oranges if you have not matched the EnGenius ECW230S to the controller) followed by the LAN LED and after that there’s the 2.4 GHz and the 5GHz LEDs (these other 3 LEDs ought to be strong blue). And after that there are 2 extra LEDs that were not on the ECW230.
That’s right, this is the very first style aspect that distinguishes the EnGenius ECW230S from the ECW230. The very first LED is accountable for the status of the scanning radio and the 2nd LED will illuminate to reveal the status of the Bluetooth radio (BLE 5). If you turn the EnGenius ECW230S around, you’ll discover the 2nd distinguishing aspect, the metal piece of the case. Rather of being smooth, as on the ECW230, it’s now ribbed and the whole case feels more robust due to the increased weight.
Undoubtedly, the EnGenius ECW230S weighs 1.34 pounds, a bit more than the ECW230. Whatever else, such as the installing ears and the ports position is the exact same. You get a Reset button (hold it for 10 seconds to return the gain access to indicate its default settings), a 2.5 GbE Ethernet port (supports 802.3 af/at) and a DC 12V port in case you wish to link it to a power adapter. There was no PoE adapter in the plan, however you can buy a different one or simply choose an PoE Ethernet switch.
What about the heat management? The ECW230 was running a bit hot to the touch that makes sense thinking about that the bottom-placed metal plate has the function of taking the heat far from the chips. And the exact same stays real for the ECW230S too thinking about that it’s a lot more congested inside the case. As you can see from the picture, it can fume to the touch, however nevertheless, I didn’t see any throttling in action.
Internal Hardware (EnGenius ECW230S Teardown)
I had no issues opening the ECW230, however things weren’t that smooth with the EnGenius ECW230S. After eliminating the 4 screws, I tried to remove the leading cover, however the producer opted for an unconventional technique when it concerned the Bluetooth antenna. They connected it to the plastic case, which is great, however the adapter was glued to the case too, which I am not exactly sure it was the designated result.
It will not have any effect on the performance of the gain access to point, simply irritating to open. The remainder of the antenna design is practically the like on the ECW230, however I discovered something weird, there was an antenna loose on the PCB. What occurred?
When I opened the cover, the antenna got separated– I utilized much better glue when I put it back together. The PCB resembles what I saw on the ECW230, however it’s not similar. At the top, there were no noteworthy chips, so I turned the board upside down.
In this manner, I might determine the Qualcomm QCA9889 which is committed for among the brand-new radios (for spotting rogue APs and more). Then, there’s the quad-core Qualcomm IPQ8072A SoC (ARM Cortex A53S CPU clocked at 2.0 GHz), 256MB of flash memory from MXIC (X201614 MX30UF2G18AC-XKI) and the 1GB of RAM from Samsung (SEC201 K4A8G165WC) which is a boost over the 512MB of the EnGenius ECW230.
Later On, I might see the SimpleLink CC2640 R2F 32-bit ARM Cortex-M3 Bluetooth 5.1 Low Energy MCU, the Qualcomm PMP8074 power management FBGA, the Qualcomm QCA8081 Ethernet PHY transceiver, the LV164A 19K G4 A8EH parallel-out serial shift register, the TPS23756 PoE PD controller and 2 MT774 LED chauffeurs. When it comes to the WiFi, EnGenius ECW230S utilizes the exact same chips as its predecessor.
EnGenius ECW220S vs ECW230S vs ECW230
|EnGenius ECW220S||EnGenius ECW230S||EnGenius ECW230|
|CPU||quad-core 1GHz Qualcomm IPQ6010||quad-core 2.0 GHz Qualcomm Atheros IPQ8072A||quad-core 2.0 GHz Qualcomm Atheros IPQ8072A|
|RAM||512MB Samsung (2x SEC 134 K4B4G16)||1GB Samsung (SEC201 K4A8G165WC)||512MB Micron (MT41K256M16TW)|
|Storage||128MB MXIC X205107 MX30UF1G18AC-XKI||256MB MXIC X201614 MX30UF2G18AC-XKI||256MB MXIC X200614 MX30LF2G18AC-XKI|
|Change||Qualcomm QCA8072||Qualcomm QCA8081||Qualcomm QCA8081|
|5GHz Radio||Qualcomm Atheros IPQ8072A (QCN5052) 802.11 a/n/ac/ ax 2 × 2:2||Qualcomm Atheros IPQ8072A (QCN5054) 802.11 ax 4 × 4:4||Qualcomm Atheros IPQ8072A (QCN5054) 802.11 ax 4 × 4:4|
|2.4 GHz Radio||Qualcomm Atheros IPQ8072A (QCN5021) 802.11 b/g/n/ ax 2 × 2:2||Qualcomm Atheros IPQ8072A (QCN5074) 802.11 ax 4 × 4:2||Qualcomm Atheros IPQ8072A (QCN5074) 802.11 ax 4 × 4:2|
There’s the Qualcomm QCN5074 and 4 Qorvo QPF4528 6CPF WiFi 802.11 ax front end modules for the 5GHz radio and a Qualcomm QCN5054 chip with 4 Qorvo QPF4228 A7SH WiFi 802.11 ax incorporated front-end modules for the 2.4 GHz radio.
The EnGenius ECW230S utilizes practically the exact same cordless performance-enhancing functions as the ECW230, so there’s the necessary OFDMA which assists a lot with thick networks. Which was primarily the point of the WiFi 6, not to outshine the WiFi 5 gadgets in regards to throughput considering that the cordless gain access to points from that requirement were quickly sufficient currently.
However the concept is to more effectively deal with a far bigger variety of customers at the exact same time. That’s where OFDMA can be found in to restrict the disturbance and enhance the bandwidth usage. Then, there’s the MU-MIMO which needs to be on all more recent networking gadgets– it’s a great function to have considering that it can guarantee that several customers can be served at the exact same time.
The only issue is that you require suitable customers and just a handful can really utilize it to its optimal capacity (I am not speaking about some 2 × 2 mobile phone). I likewise saw that the mesh innovation has actually been consisted of too that makes sense if you wish to adjoin several EnGenius gain access to points and make them act as a single network. In this manner, the suitable customer gadgets can stroll perfectly in between nodes, so the user experiences no disconnections at all.
Wireless Test (5GHz)
To evaluate the EnGenius ECW230S, I utilized a server gadget (a computer system) to which I linked a multi-Gigabit PoE switch (the EnGenius ECW2512FP), so there would be no traffic jam thinking about that the ECW230S does have a 2.5 GbE port. Then, I linked the switch to the AP and a multi-Gigabit router (Asus RT-AX86U).
When it comes to the customer gadgets, I utilized 3, one is a computer system geared up with an AX200 WiFi 6 adapter, another is a WiFi 5 gadget geared up with an Intel 8265 and the last is Pixel 2 XL mobile phone that I keep restoring primarily for this particular test. So, on the very first test, I linked the AX200 customer to the EnGenius ECW230S 5GHz network (80MHz) and I examined the throughput based upon both the signal strength and the range in between it and the server.
In this manner, I saw approximately 774Mbps upstream 5 feet far from the server gadget and 489Mbps downstream (34dB attenuation). At 45 feet, the typical throughput was 308Mbps up and 172Mbps downstream (-70 dB), however going further to about 70-75feet, the signal dropped a lot (-86 dB) which suggested that the throughput was hardly enough for some light Web usage: about 20Mbps up and downstream.
I am aware that regardless of sharing a big quantity of hardware with the ECW230, when it concerns the ECW230S it resembles checking an entirely various gadget. How come? I believe that it’s not the gain access to point, it’s whatever else. The ECW230 was evaluated in a various area and when I did so, the focus was on the range and less on the signal strength (attenuation) and disturbance.
I then needed to transfer to a brand-new area, so, checking the EnGenius ECW230S reveals various outcomes due to the fact that the house design is various and there is a varied quantity of disturbance. Which is why I have actually included the signal strength charts into the more recent posts– to be able to keep a great referral in between various designs. This is something that other publications ought to do too, it’s lesser to make an AP contrast based upon range and more important to concentrate on the signal strength.
- Airguard and Improved Diagnostics
- Good cordless efficiency
- WiFi 6 functions, consisting of OFDMA on both radio bands
- Supports PoE
- Functions with EnGenius Cloud platform
- The gadget does fume to the touch
- No PoE adapter
- No 160MHz channel bandwidth
Mark is a graduate in Computer technology, having actually collected important experience throughout the years operating in IT as a developer. Mark is likewise the primary tech author for MBReviews.com, covering not just his enthusiasm, the networking gadgets, however likewise other cool electronic gizmos that you might discover helpful for your every day life.
This short article was very first released in www.mbreviews.com.